It’s NOT about the Google Fitbit Air!
Google is making a bold play in the burgeoning screenless wearable market, directly challenging established players like Whoop and the Amazfit Helio Strap Fitness Tracker Wristband. While we’re enthusiastic about the potential of such devices, the Google Fitbit Air, as a first-generation offering, arrives with both impressive strengths and notable shortcomings. We’ve put it through its paces to uncover where it truly shines and where it stumbles, ultimately determining its place in this evolving landscape.
The Screenless Wearable Revolution
The concept of a screenless fitness tracker has been largely synonymous with Whoop, a brand that has cultivated a strong following among athletes and fitness enthusiasts. Its appeal lies in deep data insights aimed at performance improvement, though its subscription-only model, costing $200-$300 annually, isn’t for everyone. Competitors like Bevel have emerged, offering similar powerful health insights by integrating with existing devices like the Apple Watch and Garmin, though they’ve faced legal challenges from Whoop.
However, the biggest player in the data game is undoubtedly Google, and their entry with the Fitbit Air and the overarching Google Health app signals a significant shift. Google aims to be the central hub for all your health data, leveraging its AI capabilities to provide personalized coaching and insights that go beyond raw numbers.
Fitbit Air: The Upsides
Design & Comfort
- The Fitbit Air is remarkably small and comfortable, making it ideal for continuous wear, especially during sleep, where bulky smartwatches often fall short.
- Its discreet design allows it to slip easily under shirt cuffs, making it a seamless accessory for any outfit.
- The screenless nature eliminates constant distractions from notifications, allowing for a more focused approach to health tracking.
- Available in four colors with various band options, including a textile band, it offers good customization to match personal style.
Integration & Compatibility
- It pairs well with traditional watches, offering a solution for those who prefer classic timepieces but still want comprehensive health tracking.
- The device is compatible with both iOS and Android, ensuring broad accessibility. Android users benefit from quick pairing via the fast pair window.
- The Google Health app serves as a central hub, capable of importing data from Apple Health and Garmin, aiming to consolidate all your health metrics.
- In the US, users can even upload medical reports to Google Health for integrated insights with the Health Coach.
Performance & Features
- Google claims 7 days of battery life, and our testing showed a respectable 6.5 days.
- Charging is impressively fast, reaching 0-100% in just 60 minutes, and 80% in 20 minutes, making quick top-ups highly effective.
- The device features smart wake-up alarms that vibrate gently on the wrist, designed to wake you during an optimal sleep stage within a set window.
- Each morning, it provides a brief summary of your sleep and a “readiness score” with personalized suggestions for the day, even factoring in external conditions like weather.
- Auto-workout detection works for activities like walks, runs, cycle rides, and rowing, storing data locally if your phone isn’t present.
- Heart rate accuracy is excellent, closely matching the gold standard Polar H10 chest strap during runs.
- Beyond heart rate, it includes an SPO2 sensor, APIB detection, and heart rate variability. It also estimates V2 Max based on running pace and heart rate, though this requires your phone for GPS data.
Fitbit Air: The Downsides
Hardware Limitations
- A significant drawback is the lack of built-in GPS, meaning you’ll need to carry your phone to accurately track routes and distances during outdoor activities.
- Unlike some premium wearables, the Fitbit Air does not include blood pressure monitoring or ECG capabilities.
- It uses a proprietary charger with an attached cable, which is less convenient than a universal USB-C port and differs from the Pixel Watch charger, adding to cable clutter.
Software & Design Quirks
- The AI coach, while powerful, is siloed within the Google Health app. You cannot simply speak to your smartphone’s Gemini assistant to log food or water intake; you must open the specific app.
- While water-resistant up to 50 meters (suitable for swimming), there’s no official IP rating. Furthermore, the textile strap is not ideal for water activities as it takes a long time to dry.
- Google recommends removing other accessories from the wrist where the Fitbit Air is worn, which can be inconvenient for those who wear bracelets or other jewelry.
Fitbit Air: The Glitches
Workout Tracking Inconsistencies
- The workout library lacks specific activities like squash. Even when renaming a similar workout (e.g., “tennis”), the app defaults back to the original name.
- We observed instances where recorded workout data, particularly heart rate graphs, would inexplicably change or flatten after the activity, undermining data integrity.
- The AI coach, despite being “smart,” can be rigid. It continued to prompt about a Sunday squash workout even after we had completed it on a Saturday and informed the coach.
App & Alarm Issues
- The floor tracking feature consistently failed to record any floors climbed, regardless of location.
- While widgets on the main “Today” page can be adjusted, their placement is fixed, filling available slots rather than allowing user-defined reordering.
- The “smart wake-up” alarm, intended to wake you at an optimal sleep stage, sometimes triggered mid-sleep cycle, leading to grogginess.
- The alarm also failed to recognize when we were already awake, sounding 20 minutes after we had already started our day.
- Turning off the vibrating alarm required two firm taps, which proved unreliable, often needing multiple attempts.
- The device failed to provide a vibration alert for low battery, which could lead to unexpected power-offs.
Pricing & Ecosystem Comparison
The Fitbit Air itself costs $99, but its true potential is unlocked with the Google Health Premium subscription, priced at $9.99 per month or $100 per year. This recurring cost is where the AI Health Coach, adaptive fitness plans, proactive sleep insights, and the full workout library reside. Without the premium, the Fitbit Air offers basic fitness, sleep, and health tracking, which is comparable to many other devices on the market, but lacks the actionable insights that differentiate it.
In comparison, Whoop’s subscription model starts at $240-$300 annually, which includes the device. While it offers a larger device and double the battery life (14 days), advanced features like blood pressure and ECG come at an even higher cost. The Amazfit Helio Strap, which we’ve used for months, has a similar device cost and offers 10 days of battery life with a convenient USB-C puck charger. Its Zepp Aura add-on, typically $70 annually, provides more detailed sleep health assessments (e.g., sleep apnea), breathing exercises, and meditation. However, its AI is not as sophisticated as Google’s offering, and the device itself is noticeably thicker than the Fitbit Air.
Google’s strategy is clear: they want to be the ultimate data aggregator. The Google Health app is arguably the bigger product here, aiming to collect all your health dataβfrom real-time wrist metrics to medical history (in the US)βto provide comprehensive, AI-driven insights. This extensive data collection, while offering powerful benefits, also raises privacy considerations that users must be comfortable with.
Tech Specs
- Google Fitbit Air:
- Battery Life: 7 days (claimed), 6.5 days (tested)
- Charging Speed: 0-100% in 60 mins (tested), 80% in 20 mins
- Water Resistance: Up to 50m
- Sensors: Heart rate, SPO2, APIB detection, Heart Rate Variability, V2 Max (estimate)
- Compatibility: iOS, Android
- Price: $99 (device), $9.99/month or $100/year (Health Premium)
- Amazfit Helio Strap:
- Battery Life: 10 days
- Charger: USB-C puck
- Price: Similar device cost, $70/year (Zepp Aura add-on)
Final Verdict
The Google Fitbit Air is a promising entry into the screenless wearable market, offering excellent comfort, solid battery life, and accurate core health tracking. Its seamless integration with the evolving Google Health ecosystem and the potential of its AI-powered coach are its most compelling features. However, many of these advanced insights are locked behind a premium subscription, making the $99 device alone feel somewhat basic. Without the Health Premium, it’s essentially a well-designed, discreet tracker that doesn’t offer significantly more than cheaper alternatives.
For those deeply invested in the Google ecosystem or seeking a comprehensive, AI-driven health companion and are comfortable with Google’s extensive data collection, the Fitbit Air with its premium subscription could be a powerful tool. But for casual users, or those wary of recurring costs and data privacy, its current iteration, especially with its software glitches and hardware limitations like the lack of onboard GPS, might not fully justify the investment over more established or feature-rich competitors.
===DISCLOSURES===
β
We bought the AmazFit Helio Strap with our own money.
β
Google sent us these products for free for review purposes.
β
No one got input at any stage in the creation of this content. All opinions and bad jokes are strictly our own.
β
Affiliate shopping and merchandise links above earn us commission.
